The best Side of case law de listed plot from abandoned proerty supreme court

The best Side of case law de listed plot from abandoned proerty supreme court

Blog Article

These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, whether or not the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees utilize.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

Also, it might review an appeal of a decision for which it's got granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by the New Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts When the Commission cannot get to a decision.

184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, since the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, rather he continues to be acquitted from the criminal charges based on evidence and it's nicely-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted within the criminal case, then on this extremely charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment from the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all foreseeable future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become set at naught from the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing for the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to think about all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number get more info of the relevant factors. Read more

Numerous judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in inserting the Petitioner's name on the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more

Some bodies are presented statutory powers to issue assistance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.

Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It's very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety times to the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision from the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Although the couple had two young children of their have at home, the social worker didn't notify them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few experienced young children.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there can be 1 or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason for that decision of your majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted within an argument.

The realized Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced by the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of your respective parties. Read more